The
great triumph of Medina in the US Open
(
Author: ©
Javier Cordero Fernández - Translation:
Eugene Salomon)
There are victories that stand out above the rest for
their
difficulty. The milestone achieved by Medina at the US
Open in 1962, when international successes were scarce in
Spanish chess, it was just sensational. To achieve a
triumph in a tournament of this size is acomplicated task.
The US Open is a competition with history, it has been
played since 1900 and its list of winners has
illustrious names such as Fischer (1957, only 14 years old),
Korchnoi, Spassky or Larsen (winner twice), as well as
famous North American players such as Reshevsky, Fine or
Benkö. Many other names give luster to the list of
winners, from Carlos Torre Reppetto (who won in 1924) to
Judit Polgar (who won in 1998).
Every year the US Open isattended by outstanding American
and foreign masters who seek to take a good prize. The
tournament prize pool has always been important and it was
in 1962: with a registration fee of 20$, any player could
participate and fight for the succulent prizes: 1º
1,000$, 2º 500$, 3º 300$, 4º 200$, 5º 100$, 6º to 10º
50$, 11º al15º 25$. Historically, the US Open prizes
have always been highly coveted, although perhaps they
never were as much as in 1955, when the winner received a
Black Century car; the lucky one was the talented Nicolas
Rossolimo, who finished tied with Reshevsky and won in the
tie-break coefficient.
Buick
Century of 1955
In the 60's American chess was not in a buoyant situation,
few tournaments were organized and the level of activity
was quite low. Profesional chess players had a tough time.
For that reason, this type of tournament attracted those
nomads of the board who moved from city to city, from
country to country, looking for a livelihood that often
depended on their performance in that tournament. Another
good example is the Open of Lone Pine (which was played in
the 70s), which had juicy prizes donated by its creator:
Louis D. Stahman. This retired industrialist had made a
fortune inventing and producing medical equipment, and gave
free rein to his passion for chess by organizing a
tournament that in each edition managed to attract dozens
of masters from different parts of the world. In addition,
Stahman wanted to stimulate the competitiveness of the
participants giving cash prizes to the brightest game of
each round. This measure gave even more popularity to his
tournament and served so that players who were left
with no options to fight for the top positions, they could
still have the incentive of prices worth taking risks in
their games. The truth is that these types of tournaments,
almost testimonial, did not seem a good basis for chess to
grow in the country and that was counted on the huge pull
of Fischer's triumphs.
In
the 1962 edition, the city of San Antonio (Texas) was
chosen as its headquarters, a state that sometimes seems
to live apart from the rest of the country, with its own
ideas and its large ranches. And Medina and 143 other
chess players went to that peculiar land, in the middle of
August (played from the 13th to the 25th of that month),
to compete without truce for 12 rounds at the Connie
Leeger Center.
At that time, Medina
resided in Venezuela, a country where he had settled in
1953 after a tour of tournaments he had made in South
America (Rio de Janeiro, Havana and Caracas). In Caracas
he was attracted by the good economic prospects offered by
a growing country. There he worked in a pharmaceutical
laboratory, as a chess teacher, as a chess columnist in
the newspapers "El Nacional" and "El
Universal" and finally teaching at the Technical
School of Engineering. Before going to the US Open in 1962
he had decided to return to Spain. A re-organization of
FEDA (Spanish Chess Federation) with a new president had
given him good prospects for the future in national chess.
For this reason, Medina arrived in great shape in the
United States, since, freed from his work obligations, he
had more time to prepare.
Medina
vs Gilden, last round of US Open 1962
Anyone who has
participated in a tournament of these characteristics can
attest to the difficulties that have to pass to qualify
for the first positions... and this time was no exception.
Not only is it difficult to face the most outstanding
masters, you also have to face players who, although they
are not professionals, can be very dangerous and generate
surprises in each round. Medina showed from the beginning
that his presence was not going to be ignored. In fact he
led the tournament practically at alltimes until round 8,
in which Robert Byrne managed to stop him. Medina faced
the last 4 rounds with good chances, only a point behind
Byrne, Bisguier and Stephen Jones, and half of Lombardy.
He was not a favorite. However, the Spaniard knew how to
recover from the defeat suffered against Byrne and began
to get one win after another, reducing the distance that
separated him from the leading group... it was not easy,
his victory against Lapiken meant a great effort: the game
started at 7pm and ended at 3am after 88 moves; the next
round started atnoon.
Byrne lost unexpectedly to Stephen L. Jones in the ninth
round after leaving a piece in a surprising error, which
left Jones as leader alone... a fragile leader that sank
crashingly losing the last 3 games, going from great
favorite to finish 12th. At the penultimate round, with
Bisguier in the lead followed by only half a point by
Medina and Benkö... and Medina played with Bisguier. As
in most of the games of the tournament, Medina posed a
positional fight, this time with a lot of tension on the
kingside, and little by little he managed to take
advantage of the best placement of his pieces until
achieving a victory that left him in charge of tournament,
tied with Benkö, before the last and decisive round.
Medina had already played with the strongest rivals (he
drew with Benkö and Lombardy), while Benkö had to face
Lombardy and Bisguier against Byrne. His 4 rivals started
their games, while Medina went back to embark on a
positional fight against Gilden, junior champion of the
United States, who was playing in a master fashion and was
in first position alone. Medina continued to make history,
history of Spanish chess, achieving a milestone that only
Arturo Pomar had achieved before (in 1954 he had triumphed
in the US Open after finishing tied in first position with
Larry Melvin Evans).
Medina
with the winner trophy
The games of Medina
in the US Open have been hidden forall these years, they
did not appear in the bases except for some exceptional
case, although Eduardo Bauzá, after searching in American
magazines, has managed to find 10 of the 12 games of
Medina, to which you have to add another one found by Teo
Borras, which you can download below. Finally, we close
this article with the classification of the tournament in
its first 50 positions:
Clasification
US
Open 1962
Download
11 games of Medina in US Open 62 |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
Points
|
1
|
Medina, Antonio
|
1:92
|
1:48
|
1:19
|
1:23
|
½:3
|
1:31
|
½:2
|
0:5
|
1:32
|
1:17
|
1:4
|
1:18
|
10.0
|
2
|
Benkö, Pal
|
1:55
|
1:51
|
1:24
|
1:20
|
1:13
|
½:5
|
½:1
|
0:4
|
1:34
|
1:6
|
1:12
|
½:3
|
9.5
|
3
|
Lombardy, William J.
|
1:63
|
1:78
|
1:32
|
1:31
|
½:1
|
½:4
|
½:20
|
1:21
|
1:18
|
½:5
|
1:8
|
½:2
|
9.5
|
4
|
Bisguier, Arthur
|
1:80
|
1:71
|
1:15
|
½:7
|
1:8
|
½:3
|
1:23
|
1:2
|
½:6
|
1:12
|
0:1
|
½:5
|
9.0
|
5
|
Byrne, Robert
|
1:64
|
1:85
|
½:21
|
1:22
|
1:10
|
½:2
|
1:14
|
1:1
|
0:12
|
½:3
|
1:31
|
½:4
|
9.0
|
6
|
Harrow, Martin
|
1:82
|
1:66
|
0:12
|
1:75
|
1:135
|
½:7
|
1:22
|
1:20
|
½:4
|
0:2
|
1:14
|
1:13
|
9.0
|
7
|
O'Keefe, Jack
|
1:68
|
½:49
|
1:73
|
½:4
|
1:21
|
½:6
|
1:24
|
0:12
|
½:20
|
1:34
|
1:36
|
½:10
|
8.5
|
8
|
Fdez. León, José
|
1:123
|
1:40
|
1:33
|
½:9
|
0:4
|
½:45
|
½:85
|
1:48
|
1:26
|
1:11
|
0:3
|
1:12
|
8.5
|
9
|
Burger, Karl
|
1:102
|
1:46
|
1:50
|
½:8
|
½:26
|
0:23
|
1:16
|
½:11
|
0:21
|
1:48
|
1:24
|
1:22
|
8.5
|
10
|
Davila, Edmundo
|
1:65
|
½:52
|
1:130
|
1:15
|
0:5
|
0:22
|
1:30
|
½:50
|
1:47
|
1:29
|
1:32
|
½:7
|
8.5
|
11
|
Matzner, Stephen
|
1:104
|
0:69
|
1:83
|
½:66
|
1:49
|
1:35
|
½:43
|
½:9
|
1:23
|
0:8
|
1:20
|
1:32
|
8.0
|
12
|
Jones, Stephen
|
1:76
|
1:60
|
1:6
|
0:21
|
1:34
|
1:71
|
1:18
|
1:7
|
1:5
|
0:4
|
0:2
|
0:8
|
8.0
|
13
|
Szedlacsek, Louis
|
1:89
|
1:45
|
1:16
|
1:36
|
0:2
|
0:14
|
1:52
|
0:32
|
1:78
|
1:66
|
1:21
|
0:6
|
8.0
|
14
|
Sandrin, Angelo
|
1:86
|
½:37
|
½:59
|
1:53
|
1:42
|
1:13
|
0:5
|
0:34
|
1:46
|
1:43
|
0:6
|
1:33
|
8.0
|
15
|
Finegold, Ronald
|
1:56
|
1:47
|
0:4
|
0:10
|
1:121
|
½:130
|
½:35
|
1:65
|
1:38
|
0:18
|
1:45
|
1:34
|
8.0
|
16
|
Sullivan, Joseph
|
1:77
|
1:81
|
0:13
|
1:69
|
0:18
|
1:82
|
0:9
|
1:79
|
1:35
|
½:20
|
½:17
|
1:53
|
8.0
|
17
|
Lapiken, Peter
|
1:70
|
0:33
|
1:67
|
½:45
|
0:44
|
1:60
|
1:130
|
1:47
|
1:27
|
0:1
|
½:16
|
1:41
|
8.0
|
18
|
Gilden, Lawrence
|
1:67
|
1:42
|
½:22
|
½:52
|
1:16
|
1:36
|
0:12
|
1:25
|
0:3
|
1:15
|
1:23
|
0:1
|
8.0
|
19
|
Payne, John
|
1:126
|
1:84
|
0:1
|
1:33
|
½:43
|
½:44
|
0:66
|
0:35
|
1:74
|
1:79
|
1:37
|
1:31
|
8.0
|
20
|
Zuckerman, Bernard
|
1:101
|
1:38
|
1:27
|
0:2
|
1:52
|
1:26
|
½:3
|
0:6
|
½:7
|
½:16
|
0:11
|
1:48
|
7.5
|
21
|
Formanek, Edward
|
1:118
|
1:87
|
½:5
|
1:12
|
0:7
|
1:40
|
1:39
|
0:3
|
1:9
|
½:31
|
0:13
|
½:23
|
7.5
|
22
|
McCormick, Edgar
|
1:100
|
1:61
|
½:18
|
0:5
|
1:41
|
1:10
|
0:6
|
1:39
|
0:31
|
1:84
|
1:25
|
0:9
|
7.5
|
23
|
Smith, Kenneth
|
1:99
|
1:75
|
1:28
|
0:1
|
1:78
|
1:9
|
0:4
|
1:66
|
0:11
|
1:44
|
0:18
|
½:21
|
7.5
|
24
|
Saltzberg, Mitchell
|
1:91
|
1:43
|
0:2
|
1:59
|
½:40
|
1:48
|
0:7
|
0:44
|
1:81
|
1:53
|
0:9
|
1:46
|
7.5
|
25
|
Burgar, Wesley
|
1:121
|
½:130
|
½:35
|
½:38
|
½:66
|
1:59
|
1;45
|
0:18
|
½:42
|
1:30
|
0:22
|
1:43
|
7.5
|
26
|
Brieger, Robert
|
½:95
|
1:94
|
1:37
|
1:49
|
½:9
|
0:20
|
½:44
|
1:111
|
0:8
|
½:42
|
½:46
|
1:47
|
7.5
|
27
|
Lux, Tom
|
1:54
|
1:138
|
0:20
|
0:43
|
1:70
|
0:37
|
1:67
|
1:115
|
0:17
|
1:61
|
1:66
|
½:29
|
7.5
|
28
|
Burkett, Max
|
1:117
|
1:57
|
0:23
|
1:80
|
0:31
|
1:58
|
0:34
|
½:81
|
1:63
|
½:33
|
½:43
|
1:54
|
7.5
|
29
|
Trwin, Peter
|
1:129
|
½:59
|
0:49
|
1:111
|
½:47
|
0:66
|
1:55
|
1:45
|
1:85
|
0:10
|
1:44
|
½:27
|
7.5
|
30
|
Suraci, Anthony
|
½:94
|
½:95
|
1:123
|
0:82
|
1:107
|
½:88
|
0:10
|
1:97
|
1:60
|
0:25
|
1:81
|
1:58
|
7.5
|
31
|
Lyman, Shelby
|
1:97
|
1:53
|
1:135
|
0:3
|
1:28
|
0:1
|
1:78
|
½:36
|
1:22
|
½:21
|
0:5
|
0:19
|
7.0
|
32
|
Morgan, Charles
|
1:98
|
1:62
|
0:3
|
0:40
|
1:99
|
1:69
|
1:37
|
1:13
|
0:1
|
1:36
|
0:10
|
0:11
|
7.0
|
33
|
Hidalgo, Charles
|
1:110
|
1:17
|
0:8
|
0:19
|
0:56
|
1:126
|
½:97
|
1:54
|
1:39
|
½:28
|
1:51
|
0:14
|
7.0
|
34
|
Cunningham, Walter
|
0:83
|
1:139
|
1:92
|
1:46
|
0:12
|
1:75
|
1:28
|
1:14
|
0:2
|
0:7
|
1:38
|
0:15
|
7.0
|
35
|
Zangerle, Karl
|
½:108
|
1:72
|
½:25
|
½:71
|
1:82
|
0:11
|
½:15
|
1:19
|
0:16
|
½:31
|
1:68
|
½:36
|
7.0
|
36
|
Marchand, Erich
|
1:107
|
1:44
|
1:69
|
0:13
|
1:85
|
0:18
|
1:46
|
½:31
|
1:84
|
0:32
|
0:7
|
½:35
|
7.0
|
37
|
Jenkins, Thomas
|
1:111
|
½:14
|
0:26
|
½:108
|
1:54
|
1:27
|
0:32
|
0:38
|
1:101
|
1:85
|
0:19
|
1:80
|
7.0
|
38
|
Smith, George
|
1:120
|
0:20
|
1:104
|
½:25
|
0:39
|
½:55
|
1:82
|
1:37
|
0:15
|
1:56
|
0:34
|
1:67
|
7.0
|
39
|
Slifer, William
|
0:138
|
1:119
|
½:41
|
1:62
|
1:38
|
1:53
|
0:21
|
0:22
|
0:33
|
1:80
|
½:61
|
1:66
|
7.0
|
40
|
Tiers, George
|
1:133
|
0:8
|
1:54
|
1:32
|
½:24
|
0:21
|
½:47
|
0:78
|
1:67
|
0:51
|
1:99
|
1:57
|
7.0
|
41
|
Street, Frank
|
+:88
|
0:50
|
½:39
|
1:61
|
0:22
|
0:79
|
1:95
|
1:68
|
1:52
|
½:35
|
1:42
|
0:17
|
7.0
|
42
|
Shaw, Jack
|
1:127
|
0:18
|
1:107
|
1:115
|
0:14
|
½:128
|
½:79
|
1:99
|
½:25
|
½:26
|
0:41
|
1:72
|
7.0
|
43
|
McIlrath, Jim
|
1:141
|
0:24
|
1:90
|
1:27
|
½:19
|
1:50
|
½:11
|
½:85
|
½:44
|
0:14
|
½:28
|
0:25
|
6.5
|
44
|
Castle, Richard
|
1:124
|
0:36
|
½:55
|
1:122
|
1:17
|
½:19
|
½:26
|
1:24
|
½:43
|
0:23
|
0:29
|
½:51 |
6.5
|
45
|
Rohland, Marshall
|
+:144
|
0:13
|
1:95
|
½:17
|
1:96
|
½:8
|
0:25
|
0:29
|
1:64
|
1:78
|
0:15
|
½:55
|
6.5
|
46
|
Berry, George
|
1:96
|
0:9
|
1:91
|
=.34
|
1:86
|
1:67
|
0:36
|
1:56
|
0:14
|
1:99
|
½:26
|
0:24
|
6.5
|
47
|
Kane, George
|
1:128
|
0:15
|
1:116
|
½:50
|
½:29
|
+:135
|
½:40
|
0:17
|
0:10
|
1:70
|
1:82
|
0:26
|
6.5
|
48
|
Christman, James
|
1:131
|
0:1
|
1:86
|
½:96
|
1:79
|
0:24
|
1:128
|
0:8
|
1:111
|
0:9
|
1:63
|
0:20
|
6.5
|
49
|
Slater, Kathryn
|
1:125
|
½:7
|
1:29
|
0:26
|
0:11
|
1:57
|
0:50
|
½:64
|
0:79
|
½:86
|
1:90
|
1:87
|
6.5
|
50
|
Mego, Joseph
|
1:119
|
1:41
|
0:9
|
½:47
|
1:60
|
0:43
|
1:49
|
½:10
|
0:66
|
0:58
|
1:74
|
½:62
|
6.5
|
-
Up to a total of 144 players -
Javier
Cordero Fernández
(June
26, 2017)
|